English

1998 matters because information begins to be approached through search rather than through fixed entrances alone.

In the earlier web, to find something often meant knowing where it lived. Users relied on directories, portal structures, bookmarks, recommendations, printed references, or social memory. The path to information was still relatively architectural: one had to remember gateways, categories, and names. Search changed that relationship. Instead of remembering where information belonged, one could increasingly begin with a query.

This shift looks simple in retrospect, but it marked a deep civilizational change. Search did not merely save time. It reorganized how people imagined knowledge. Information no longer needed to be approached only through hierarchy, institution, or prior familiarity. It could be called up through language. The user no longer needed only memory of locations; the user needed the ability to ask.

That is why search in 1998 can be understood as a new sense. A sense does not only give access; it changes orientation. Search gave people a new way of moving through an expanding information environment. It made the web feel less like a maze of disconnected places and more like a space that could answer to intent.

This mattered especially because the amount of available information was already beginning to exceed the practical capacity of directories and hand-curated navigation. The web was growing too quickly for static maps alone. Search became the adaptive layer that let ordinary users enter a dynamic information world without first mastering its structure in advance.

In China, this shift had special significance. As digital adoption widened, many users did not enter the internet through a long tradition of institutional computing. They entered through practical need, urban curiosity, education, work, and emerging online habits. Search offered a way to bridge inexperience. One did not need to know the whole map. One only needed to know what to ask for.

Search also changed cognition. It encouraged short expressions of intent, keyword thinking, and problem-led navigation. This began to alter not only how people found information, but how they understood knowledge itself. To know something increasingly included knowing that it could be found again. Memory did not disappear, but part of memory’s burden shifted outward into systems.

Later decades would turn search into a giant infrastructure of ranking, advertising, optimization, and strategic visibility. But in 1998, its historical force was more elementary. Search taught society that information abundance did not have to produce paralysis. It could produce a new form of orientation.

One-sentence summary:

The key to 1998 is that ‘knowing where’ began to yield to ‘knowing how to ask,’ and search became a new sense for navigating information.

---

中文

1998 年的重要性，在于人们开始不再只依赖固定入口接近信息，而是越来越多地通过“搜索”来接近信息。

在更早的网络阶段，要找到某样东西，往往意味着你得先知道它“放在哪里”。用户依赖目录、门户、收藏夹、推荐链接、印刷材料，或者朋友告诉你的路径。信息入口仍然带有很强的建筑性：你要记住门户名称、分类结构、站点位置，像在一座刚刚长出来的城市里背地图。

搜索改变了这种关系。人们不再总是从“地点”出发，而开始从“问题”出发。与其记住信息属于哪里，不如先输入你想找什么。这个变化今天看似理所当然，但在当时，它其实是一次相当深的认知转向。搜索并不只是帮人省时间，它重组了人们想象知识的方式：信息不再只能通过层级、机构和熟悉入口来抵达，它开始可以通过语言被直接唤起。人不再只需要记得位置，更需要学会发问。

因此，1998 年的搜索完全可以被理解为一种新的感官。所谓感官，并不只是提供接入，它还改变一个人对世界的定向能力。搜索给了人们一种在信息迅速膨胀的环境中重新定位自己的方法。网络不再只是一个由分散地点组成的迷宫，它开始像一个可以对人的意图作出响应的空间。

这件事之所以重要，是因为网络的信息量已经开始快于目录系统和人工整理所能承受的速度。网页增长过快，静态地图越来越不够用。搜索成为一种自适应层，让普通用户不需要先掌握全部结构，也能进入一个不断扩张的信息世界。

在中国语境下，这种变化尤其关键。随着数字接入逐步扩展，很多人并不是沿着一条长期的机构计算传统进入网络的，他们是因为工作、学习、城市生活、好奇心和实际需求才逐步走近互联网。搜索降低了经验门槛：你不必先知道整张地图，只要先知道你想找什么。对于大量后来进入数字生活的人来说，这是一种非常关键的过桥方式。

搜索也悄悄改变了认知方式。它鼓励关键词思维，鼓励问题导向，鼓励把模糊需求压缩成可以提交给系统的简短表达。久而久之，这种习惯不仅改变了人们找资料的方法，也改变了人们理解知识本身的方式：知道某样东西，不再只是把它完整记在脑子里，也意味着知道它可以被再次找到。记忆没有消失，但记忆的一部分负担开始被外部系统接走。

后来的二十多年里，搜索会变成庞大的基础设施，背后会长出排序、广告、优化、可见性竞争，以及围绕注意力展开的全新经济逻辑。但在 1998 年，它最原初的历史力量还很简单：它让社会第一次意识到，信息的增多不一定只带来迷失，也可以带来一种新的定向能力。

从这个意义上说，搜索不仅是一项功能，更是一种文明层面的适应工具。它让人们在信息爆炸真正到来之前，先学会一种和海量信息共处的方法。目录告诉你世界是怎样被整理的，搜索则开始告诉你：只要会问，世界也可以向你打开。

一句话概括：

1998 年的关键，是‘记得在哪’开始让位于‘知道怎么问’，搜索成为信息时代的一种新感官。